Laotian vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,955,099 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 23.4 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $86,398, a difference of 9.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $96,377, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $102,629, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $45,049, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $56,390, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.3%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.70%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%).