Hmong vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,587,867 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.935% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 934.9 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,049, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $56,390, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $102,629, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.92%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $50,563, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,709, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.8%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%).