Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,818,802 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to an increase of 21.7 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $102,629, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $105,144, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $39,613, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $50,563, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $47,470, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 38.5%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.6%), married-couple households (41.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 175.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 59.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 53.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%).