Ecuadorian vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,688,413 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,709, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $105,144, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,613, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,470, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $96,377, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 154.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.9%).