Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,321,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 120.6 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $63,326, a difference of 19.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $108,751, a difference of 19.3%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $116,942, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $55,891, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $64,512, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 17.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.40%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%).