Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,770,702 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 68.8 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $52,044, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $63,326, a difference of 18.0%), and median earnings ($45,933 compared to $53,457, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $64,512, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $55,891, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 89.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 37.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%).