Australian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,710,509 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 201.7 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $55,891, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $64,512, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,074 compared to $52,044, a difference of 0.060%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $96,378, a difference of 0.12%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $113,215, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%).