Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,700,994 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.675% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 2,674.6 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $55,891, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $44,680, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,217 compared to $52,044, a difference of 0.33%), median family income ($115,847 compared to $116,942, a difference of 0.94%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $113,215, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.70%), currently married (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%).