Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,356,972 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 115.8 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $52,044, a difference of 38.1%), median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $63,326, a difference of 33.5%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $116,942, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $55,891, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $64,512, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 65.3%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 43.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.7%), no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 66.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.9%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 7.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.5%).