Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,748,257 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 170.5 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $44,680, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,891, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $53,457, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $64,512, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $113,215, a difference of 3.4%), and median family income ($112,038 compared to $116,942, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.6% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.8%).