Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Russia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Russia

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Russia Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,933,755 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 57.8 Immigrants from Russia.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Russia Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $52,044, a difference of 69.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $113,215, a difference of 54.3%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,378, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,891, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,680, a difference of 26.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$52,044
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$116,942
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$96,378
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$53,457
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$63,326
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$44,680
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$55,891
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$108,751
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$113,215
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$64,512
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Poor
26.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 123.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 123.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 89.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
50.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 109.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 95.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
53.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 78.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Russia Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Russia
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Good
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Poor
2.5%