Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Russia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Russia
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Russia Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,891,251 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Russia.
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,996 compared to $52,044, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $113,215, a difference of 57.0%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $96,378, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $63,326, a difference of 25.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $55,891, a difference of 26.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $53,457, a difference of 37.2%).
Income Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $52,044 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $116,942 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $96,378 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $53,457 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $63,326 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $44,680 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $55,891 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $108,751 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $113,215 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $64,512 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 97.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 86.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.0%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 70.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 73.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 71.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.46%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Tragic 85.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Tragic 50.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 172.5%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 163.0%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 145.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 64.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 53.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Russia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 89.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 79.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.7%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 19.5%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Russia |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Good 47.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Poor 2.5% |