Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,264,423 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $52,044, a difference of 56.4%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $116,942, a difference of 44.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $108,751, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $55,891, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $64,512, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 73.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 70.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 57.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.9%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 58.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.0%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 104.4%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 95.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 80.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.9%).