White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,935,188 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $52,044, a difference of 23.4%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $44,680, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $108,751, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $64,512, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $55,891, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 22.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (48.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 114.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.76%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%).