Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,506,717 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 225.0 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $64,512, a difference of 8.1%), per capita income ($55,582 compared to $52,044, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $44,680, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($54,478 compared to $53,457, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $108,751, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.1%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.78%).