Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,278,321 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 26.6 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($116,460 compared to $96,378, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $113,215, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $64,512, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $55,891, a difference of 6.3%), median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $44,680, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($57,742 compared to $52,044, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.6%), single father poverty (13.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother poverty (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.37%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.0%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (50.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 95.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.8%).