Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,917,514 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 41.9 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,165 compared to $52,044, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $108,751, a difference of 34.5%), and median male earnings ($48,317 compared to $63,326, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $55,891, a difference of 16.5%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $44,680, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $64,512, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 58.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 38.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 76.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.3%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).