Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,237,202 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 11.1 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,792 compared to $52,044, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,368 compared to $108,751, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($53,967 compared to $63,326, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $55,891, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $64,512, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.81%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.55%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 68.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.39%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%).