Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,405,123 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($83,319 compared to $116,942, a difference of 40.4%), per capita income ($37,254 compared to $52,044, a difference of 39.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $113,215, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $55,891, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $44,680, a difference of 22.7%), and wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 81.8%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 52.3%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 96.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 70.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.4%).