Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,969,207 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 261.2 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $44,680, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($52,195 compared to $53,457, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $64,512, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $113,215, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($115,523 compared to $116,942, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.48%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.1%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%).