Native/Alaskan vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,187,875 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $47,248, a difference of 42.0%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $107,502, a difference of 32.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $99,449, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $49,113, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $61,093, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 107.9%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 89.0%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.0%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 69.0%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.9%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.2%), family households (66.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.4%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 76.3%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.67%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.9%).