Indian (Asian) vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,912,033 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($105,262 compared to $86,635, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $99,449, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $102,777, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $40,825, a difference of 13.9%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $47,248, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 30.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.43%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.06, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 80.3%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.8%).