English vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,872,330 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within English communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in English within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 English corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.1%), per capita income ($43,982 compared to $47,248, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($38,196 compared to $40,825, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,487 compared to $61,093, a difference of 0.64%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,021 compared to $102,777, a difference of 0.74%), and median household income ($84,915 compared to $86,635, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.9%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.06, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.6%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between English and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).