Immigrants from South Africa vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,002,811 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 274.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,800 compared to $86,635, a difference of 10.6%), householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $61,093, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,886 compared to $102,777, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $40,825, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $49,113, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.79%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.3%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.44%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.6%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.2%).