Latvian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,636,102 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 50.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $102,777, a difference of 12.8%), median household income ($97,311 compared to $86,635, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $107,502, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,113, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,825, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.06, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and ged/equivalency (89.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.6%).