Czech vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,948,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 53.9 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $47,248, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,825, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,093, a difference of 0.25%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $86,635, a difference of 0.55%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $102,777, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.9%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.73%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.32%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 55.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.9%).