Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Carpatho Rusyn
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Carpatho Rusyns
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,089,953 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.286% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 1,285.6 Carpatho Rusyns.
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $47,248, a difference of 23.9%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $57,572, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $99,449, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $49,113, a difference of 0.51%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,093, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $47,248 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $107,502 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Good $86,635 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $48,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Exceptional $57,572 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $40,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $49,113 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Exceptional $99,449 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Good $102,777 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Average $61,093 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.3% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.3%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.8%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 42.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 5.4% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 87.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.06 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Good 30.9% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Fair 10.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 42.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Hmong vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Carpatho Rusyn |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |