Lithuanian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,712,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 103.2 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $102,777, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $49,113, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $86,635, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $40,825, a difference of 3.1%), per capita income ($49,448 compared to $47,248, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $48,617, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 15.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.9%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households (64.0% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.63%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.06, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.7%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and college, under 1 year (68.8% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (94.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.84%).