Argentinean vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,400,166 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.041% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 2,041.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $49,113, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $86,635, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $102,777, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $40,825, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $48,617, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.8%), family households (65.0% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.06, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.71%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.1%).