Ecuadorian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,901,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $107,502, a difference of 13.0%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $47,248, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,825, a difference of 4.4%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $86,635, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,617, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (65.0% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 113.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 115.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 5.7%).