Immigrants from Belarus vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,217,766 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 226.8 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $49,113, a difference of 13.5%), median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $40,825, a difference of 9.6%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $48,617, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $61,093, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and per capita income ($50,303 compared to $47,248, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 20.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.69%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%).