Fijian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,579,076 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 152.0 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $47,248, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $57,572, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $99,449, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $49,113, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,093, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $40,825, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.6%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 100.4%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 80.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.6%), female disability (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).