Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Carpatho Rusyn
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Carpatho Rusyns
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,162,447 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 51.0 Carpatho Rusyns.
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $49,113, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $86,635, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $61,093, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,041 compared to $47,248, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $57,572, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $40,825, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Exceptional $47,248 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Exceptional $107,502 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Good $86,635 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Exceptional $48,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Exceptional $57,572 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Exceptional $40,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Tragic $49,113 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Exceptional $99,449 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Good $102,777 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Average $61,093 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.6%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 87.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (65.8% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.81%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 61.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.06 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Good 30.9% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 10.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.9%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and ged/equivalency (86.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.89%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Exceptional 42.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Laotian vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |