Immigrants from Fiji vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,366,178 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 30.6 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $49,113, a difference of 16.2%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $47,248, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,305 compared to $48,617, a difference of 0.65%), median family income ($106,544 compared to $107,502, a difference of 0.90%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $40,825, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 42.6%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.7%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.5%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.6%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 44.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 155.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%).