Immigrants from Lithuania vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,773,702 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 125.2 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $49,113, a difference of 12.0%), median household income ($96,836 compared to $86,635, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $102,777, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $40,825, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $61,093, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.62%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.06, a difference of 3.0%), currently married (48.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (63.9% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.81%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.1%), bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).