Samoan vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,435,968 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $47,248, a difference of 18.6%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $57,572, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $49,113, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,498 compared to $86,635, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $102,777, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 30.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.66%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.1%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 66.7%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.28%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.82%).