Finnish vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,187,354 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,461 compared to $47,248, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $40,825, a difference of 7.0%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $48,617, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $61,093, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $102,777, a difference of 2.9%), and median household income ($83,607 compared to $86,635, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.06, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), female disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%).