Immigrants from Moldova vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,645,811 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.966. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 191.1 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $49,113, a difference of 14.4%), median household income ($91,446 compared to $86,635, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $102,777, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,489 compared to $47,248, a difference of 0.51%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $99,449, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $107,502, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.9%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 13.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.9%).