Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,100,950 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $65,518, a difference of 12.3%), median family income ($109,418 compared to $122,764, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $69,774, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $55,932, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $45,323, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.060%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.82%).