Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,656,978 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $65,518, a difference of 23.1%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $53,359, a difference of 22.8%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $122,764, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $55,932, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $45,323, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.1%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.4%).