Celtic vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,582,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $53,359, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $112,228, a difference of 21.7%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $122,764, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $55,932, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $69,774, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.9%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (63.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%).