Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,680,794 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 58.2 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $53,359, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $65,518, a difference of 17.6%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $54,938, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $69,774, a difference of 8.3%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.23%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.8%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%).