Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,656,329 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $122,764, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $65,518, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $118,498, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $45,323, a difference of 17.3%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $54,938, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 67.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.8%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 108.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 48.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 67.2%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%).