Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,273,605 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 97.9 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median earnings ($49,722 compared to $54,938, a difference of 10.5%), median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $65,518, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $112,228, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.11%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $69,774, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,932, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 17.3%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.35%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.4%).