Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,743,902 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 160.9 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $53,359, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $65,518, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $112,228, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $55,932, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $69,774, a difference of 0.12%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.78%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.6%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.4%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.97%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).