Immigrants from Albania vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,174,688 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Albania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Albania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Albania corresponds to a decrease of 33.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,828 compared to $69,774, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($105,285 compared to $122,764, a difference of 16.6%), and median household income ($86,534 compared to $100,711, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,597 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($42,388 compared to $45,323, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($49,377 compared to $54,938, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.4%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.41%), family households (62.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 52.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (46.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (46.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.2%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Albania and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%).