Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,034,742 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $53,359, a difference of 7.9%), median earnings ($50,991 compared to $54,938, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $45,323, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $55,932, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $118,498, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.2%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.71%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%).