Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,143,908 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,414 compared to $122,764, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $65,518, a difference of 21.4%), and per capita income ($44,068 compared to $53,359, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $55,932, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $45,323, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.9%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.83%).