Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,219,174 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.812. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.435% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 435.3 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $53,359, a difference of 41.5%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $122,764, a difference of 39.5%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $65,518, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $55,932, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $45,323, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 92.9%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 90.1%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 47.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.2%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.5%).