Crow vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,493,529 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 119.2 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $53,359, a difference of 68.2%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $122,764, a difference of 60.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $118,498, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,932, a difference of 19.0%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $45,323, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $69,774, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 125.0%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 122.2%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 116.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 37.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 267.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 240.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 237.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 78.5%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 52.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 101.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.5%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.2%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.8%).